OpenText Software Delivery Management
What is OpenText Software Delivery Management?
OpenText™ ALM Octane includes integrated planning, continuous integration, test management, and release management. With these capabilities, Agile teams and DevOps toolchains deliver high-quality software with insight, traceability, analytics-focused end-to-end visibility, and continuous quality.
Company Details
Need Assistance?
We're here to help you with understanding our reports and the data inside to help you make decisions.
Get AssistanceOpenText Software Delivery Management Ratings
Real user data aggregated to summarize the product performance and customer experience.
Download the entire Product Scorecard
to access more information on OpenText Software Delivery Management.
Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.
88 Likeliness to Recommend
97 Plan to Renew
82 Satisfaction of Cost Relative to Value
1
Since last award
Emotional Footprint Overview
Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.
+98 Net Emotional Footprint
The emotional sentiment held by end users of the software based on their experience with the vendor. Responses are captured on an eight-point scale.
How much do users love OpenText Software Delivery Management?
Pros
- Reliable
- Trustworthy
- Respectful
- Acts with Integrity
How to read the Emotional Footprint
The Net Emotional Footprint measures high-level user sentiment towards particular product offerings. It aggregates emotional response ratings for various dimensions of the vendor-client relationship and product effectiveness, creating a powerful indicator of overall user feeling toward the vendor and product.
While purchasing decisions shouldn't be based on emotion, it's valuable to know what kind of emotional response the vendor you're considering elicits from their users.
Footprint
Negative
Neutral
Positive
Feature Ratings
Test tools integration
Test Environment Management
Test Script Editor
Test Planning
ALM Integration
Test Run Workflow Manager
Test Data Management
Analytics and Reporting
Test Case Generator
Artifact Traceability
Test Load Balancing
Vendor Capability Ratings
Ease of Implementation
Quality of Features
Business Value Created
Availability and Quality of Training
Breadth of Features
Usability and Intuitiveness
Ease of Customization
Ease of IT Administration
Ease of Data Integration
Product Strategy and Rate of Improvement
Vendor Support
Also Featured in...
OpenText Software Delivery Management Reviews
Brian F.
- Role: Information Technology
- Industry: Technology
- Involvement: End User of Application
Submitted Jun 2024
OpenText ALM Octane is a good, very useful program
Likeliness to Recommend
What differentiates OpenText Software Delivery Management from other similar products?
If you have experience with ALM products, you should use it for DevOps. How well this works with Jenkins and other DevOps tools is something else I'm interested in.
What is your favorite aspect of this product?
Everything needed for a Product Development Lifecycle is right here in this tool. If you want the best value and service for your clients, we can interface with any industry leader. We get prompt responses from the Consultants to our questions. The application's user interface is highly responsive, making it compatible with nearly all devices.
What do you dislike most about this product?
New installations and settings have a dearth of available tutorials.
What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?
Its ability to work with DevOps technologies for continuous testing makes it a top pick in my book for making sure that builds are of high quality.
Pros
- Reliable
- Efficient Service
- Effective Service
- Saves Time
Akshata S.
- Role: Information Technology
- Industry: Technology
- Involvement: Business Leader or Manager
Submitted Mar 2026
OpenText Software Delivery Management Tool
Likeliness to Recommend
What differentiates OpenText Software Delivery Management from other similar products?
One of the things that differentiates OpenText Software Delivery Management from similar tools is its ability to bring multiple stages of the software lifecycle into a single platform. It combines agile planning, test management, and release tracking so teams can manage work, testing, and delivery without switching between several tools. This helps teams maintain better visibility across the entire development process.
What is your favorite aspect of this product?
My favorite aspect of this product is the visibility it provides across the entire software delivery process. It’s easy to track requirements, testing progress, and releases in one place, which helps the team stay aligned. The dashboards and reporting also make it simple to understand the overall project status without spending too much time gathering information from different tools. Overall, it helps improve collaboration and keeps the workflow more organized.
What do you dislike most about this product?
One thing I dislike about this product is that the interface can feel a bit complex at times, especially for new users who are just getting started.
What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?
My recommendation would be to first evaluate how well the product fits with your existing development and testing processes.
Pros
- Helps Innovate
- Trustworthy
- Efficient Service
- Respectful
Akshata S.
- Role: Information Technology
- Industry: Technology
- Involvement: Business Leader or Manager
Submitted Feb 2026
Strong visibility across the delivery lifecycle
Likeliness to Recommend
What differentiates OpenText Software Delivery Management from other similar products?
OpenText Software Delivery Management stands out because it provides a centralized view of the entire delivery process across tools and teams. Instead of working in isolated silos, teams can see dependencies, risks, and progress in one place, which helps with planning and coordination. The ability to link requirements, development work, test results, and deployment metrics makes it easier to track real outcomes rather than just completed tasks. Another key difference is its focus on visibility and predictability. It brings together data from various DevOps and ALM tools into dashboards and reports that help leadership understand where bottle
What is your favorite aspect of this product?
My favorite aspect of this product is the end-to-end visibility it provides across the software delivery lifecycle. Having requirements, development, testing, and release data all connected in one place makes it much easier to understand progress and spot issues early. Instead of relying on updates from multiple tools or teams, we can quickly see where things stand and where attention is needed. This visibility has been especially helpful for planning, coordination, and keeping stakeholders aligned.
What do you dislike most about this product?
What I dislike most is the complexity and learning curve. Getting the platform set up and fully integrated with existing tools takes time, and it’s not always intuitive for new users.
What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?
I would recommend clearly defining your goals and use cases before adopting this product. It works best for teams that need visibility across multiple tools and stages of the delivery lifecycle, especially at an enterprise scale. Plan enough time for setup, integrations, and onboarding, as there is a learning curve. Having dedicated owners or admins who understand the platform makes a big difference. If your organization values governance, reporting, and cross-team alignment, this product can deliver strong value once it’s properly implemented.
Pros
- Helps Innovate
- Reliable
- Performance Enhancing
- Enables Productivity