Conga CLM

What differentiates Conga CLM from other similar products?

Conga CLM is ideal! Its distinguishing features which make it truly unique include how easy it is to create contract templates, how readily those templates can be altered to best suit our needs, and how effortlessly those needs can be met through adaptation. Its dependability and flexibility with the convergence of CPQ and ALM are also its most fantastic and unique parts.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

The ability to use pre-made templates for numerous capabilities, including original agreements, modification orders, proposals, and other supporting documents that cover diverse stipulations, is one of the most remarkable features and what makes it cool in the marketplace. Its scalability and sturdiness for CPQ and ALM integration are also one of the aspects we really like. The greatest customization functionality is offered.

What do you dislike most about this product?

There are not many things about Conga CLM product that is bad. Conga CLM has a track record of producing effective solutions. However, one criticism is that it is expensive, additionally, the Word X-Author plugin is not reliable and sufficient because it frequently breaks.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Conga CLM is exceedingly wonderful and powerful. If you want to manage your contracts more efficiently while saving time, Conga CLM is a must-use solution. The assimilation of Conga CLM and e-singing systems is greatly beneficial and greatly speeds up the e-signature process and overall contract process.

What differentiates Conga CLM from other similar products?

The Conga CLM and Adobesign combination is beneficial and dramatically speeds up the e-signature process. It can integrate several platforms and offer a wide range of assistance. Additionally, Apttus CLMand CPQ integration offers consumers a smooth experience and aids in their goal-achieving. Additionally, Conga CLM offers Xauthor enables easy redlining and uploading of contracts.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

My favorite feature of the Conga CLM tool is its adaptability to different contract scenarios. I chose it because of how well it supports CPQ and ALM integration and how sturdy it is. It's flexible enough to accommodate an infinite number of possible contract scenarios. Using xauthor technology, you can easily add new clauses, appendices, and agreements to a standard Word template while tying in Salesforce variables.

What do you dislike most about this product?

I wouldn't say I like that it cannot keep track of repeated redlined check-ins without discarding all prior edits. Creating new documents seems to be taking more time than usual. The production of templates and the X-Author interface are both excessively sluggish. Line item presentment constraints in the quotation record could also be more flexible.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Apttus CLM is helping us standardize our disparate approaches to contract management. It would seem that Apttus Contract Management is a viable option for Contracts. The Apttus CPQ tool's ability to adapt to a wide range of contract scenarios is a significant selling point for me. All the local and worldwide adjustments I've made to client contracts are now easily documented.

What differentiates Conga CLM from other similar products?

Unlike other products, Conga is a cutting-edge CLM system. It is the best customization functionality currently available. Processes and OOB capabilities that aid customization without a lot of code. It syncs with data and is connected with all of our systems. It is also incredibly configurable. It can also be linked entirely with the built-in CRM system from Salesforce.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

I appreciate how the contract is generated and presented in a form that is easy for the end user to grasp. It is an established solution in the CPQ space and expandable for any necessary integrations. I can configure the package to meet our specific needs using doc assembly rule sets, which is excellent. The availability of pre-built templates for often used legal papers is a notable feature.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Although the licensing fee is high, it may be reasonable considering the many helpful features. Users would benefit from some minor tweaks to the site's navigation. There is a need for further elaboration in the Guide's present section on best practices. It was a lot of work to set up Conga CLM to deal with that complexity.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

The Apptus CLM package fills the void left by the need for a manual procedure to complete agreements, which may hinder communication between the Marketing and Administrative departments at a crucial juncture. To minimize future problems, Conga must expedite the contract approval procedure with the appropriate stakeholders before putting it in the package.