- Daniel Adewumi, Project Manager, MHPM Project Managers Inc.
- Martin Brennan, Development Manager, Integration Works
- Dr. Holly Catalfamo, HR Program Coordinator, Niagara College
- Laura Garner, Training & Development Professional
- Thomas Garrod, Senior Organizational Learning Consultant, KnowAce
- Harold Jarche, Principal, Jarche Consulting and Chairman, Internet Time Alliance
- Tom Kuhlman, VP, Community at Articulate and Author “Insiders Guide to Becoming A Rapid E-learning Pro”
- Dan Stone, Manager, Organizational Development, IFDS
- David Vance, Executive Director, Center for Talent Reporting and Founder, Caterpillar University
- Craig Weiss, CEO,E-learning 24/7
- Organizations are under pressure to deliver training and development with scarce financial resources; this attracts them to e-learning because of its seemingly low cost and flexibility to implement and use. Most organizations do not look beyond the initial cost savings.
- Measurement and evaluation is viewed as cumbersome and difficult (sometimes even as impossible), when in fact it is possible to quantify the effectiveness of e-learning.
- Organizational e-learning is often fragmented, and stakeholder input is a missing piece in laying the foundation for e-learning success.
- Most organizations will maintain or increase their investment in e-learning in the near future despite inconsistent findings about its cost-effectiveness and impact on learning outcomes. Ignoring or giving insufficient weight to learning objectives wastes money in the long run, and undermines both learning and cost reduction goals.
- E-learning is effective for specific content, competencies, and learners, and must always be used in conjunction with other learning methods (such as coaching and on-the-job training). However, e-learning is often used in isolation. If e-learning is not part of a blended learning strategy, target learning outcomes will not be met.
- Organizations that are committed to optimizing their e-learning must thoroughly assess the suitability for their organization, not simply adopt it because it’s trendy. Commit to reviewing the initiative and explore other alternative learning methods that you could use instead of e-learning, or alongside it, to do what makes the most sense for your organization.
Impact and Result
- Make the case for evaluating e-learning’s effectiveness in your organization.
- Conduct an inventory of your e-learning applications and tools to find out what’s in use and by whom.
- Carry out an appropriateness assessment to gauge each e-learning tool’s alignment with target learning outcomes.
- Identify metrics for measuring e-learning’s progress against learning and cost containment goals.
- Build an e-learning plan for the future.
This guided implementation is a two call advisory process.
Call #1 - E-learning appropriateness assessment
Assessing e-learning appropriateness is critical. Determine if your e-learning applications and tools are appropriate given your target competencies, content, and learners.
Call #2 - E-learning effectiveness metrics
Metrics provide valuable information to sustain or increase investment in e-learning. Determine what metrics you need to evaluate e-learning effectiveness in terms of both learning outcomes and cost-effectiveness.