Total Rewards icon

Create a Job Worth Hierarchy Based on Internal Worth

Select a best-fit job evaluation method to effectively assess the relative worth of positions in the organization.

Unlock

This content requires an active subscription.

Access this content by logging in with your McLean & Company membership or contacting one of our representatives for assistance.

Speak With A Representative Sign In
or Call: 1-877-281-0480 (US) or 1-877-281-0480 (CAN)

View Storyboard

Solution Set Storyboard thumbnail

Contributors

  • Erin Berg, Senior Compensation Analyst, Mayo Clinic
  • Joel De Los Santos, Compensation Expert, Bayer
  • Kimberly Fleming, HR Specialist in Total Compensation & Job Evaluation, Trent University
  • Samantha Harak, Manager of Compensation & Benefits, Goldcorp
  • Josephine Lee, Manager of Compensation & Recognition, PwC Canada
  • Rick Radulski, Compensation Professor, University of Calgary
  • Mathew Sebastian, Human Resources Specialist in Compensation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT)
  • Toni Umerez, Manager of Total Compensation Services and HRIS, Sheridan College

Your Challenge

Many organizations have moved to a compensation setting model that relies exclusively on market pricing – showing unjustified confidence in its reliability and an overreliance on external equity.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Job worth hierarchies and market pricing should be treated as complements to one another, not substitutes.
  • When selecting a job evaluation method, err on the side of defensibility.
  • Job evaluation doesn’t need to be burdensome.
  • Establish a maintenance process to regularly verify that the job worth hierarchy is aligned to strategy, incorporating flexibility.

Impact and Result

  • Organizations need to find the right balance between internal and external equity in order to allocate scarce labor dollars effectively.
  • To accomplish this, organizations must first determine their internal job worth hierarchy via job evaluation.
  • This blueprint will help you bring job evaluation and job worth hierarchies into the 21st century: reduce the bureaucratic burden, ensure strategic alignment, and increase flexibility.

Research & Tools

2. Perform job evaluation

Complete the job evaluation, review the results, and document the process.

3. Communicate and maintain job evaluation

Set a target for organizational job worth transparency, get executive sign-off, and create an appeals process.

Guided Implementations

This guided implementation is a three call advisory process.

Guided Implementation #1 - Prepare for job evaluation

Call #1 - Call content includes project rationale, job evaluation method selection, and committee considerations.

Guided Implementation #2 - Perform job evaluation

Call #1 - Call content includes approach for selected job evaluation method, including required stakeholders, process information, and common pitfalls. (Note: more than one call may be required for members employing the point factor approach.)

Guided Implementation #3 - Communicate and maintain job evaluation

Call #1 - Call content includes target transparency, ongoing maintenance planning, and establishing an appeals process.

Onsite Workshop

Discuss This Workshop

Book Your Workshop

Onsite workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost onsite delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

Module 1: Select Factors That Will Be Used to Evaluate Jobs

The Purpose

Ensure factors that are chosen are linked with organizational strategy and will remain relevant for long periods of time.

Key Benefits Achieved

Organizationally aligned factors are selected.

Activities

Outputs

1.1

Select strategically aligned factors.

  • Factors are assigned based on importance within the organization

Module 2: Tailor the Point Factor System for Your Organization

The Purpose

  • Input weighting for factors based on importance to organizational strategy.
  • Assign percentage points for the factors based on value to the organization.

Key Benefits Achieved

  • Jobs are weighted and assigned points, setting up the point factor method for implementation.

Activities

Outputs

2.1

Set factor weights and point allocations.

  • Factors are weighted and given percentage points

Module 3: Execute and Maintain the Point Factor Tool

The Purpose

  • Ensure the point factor method runs in accordance with the organizational strategy.

Key Benefits Achieved

  • Point factor method successfully implemented into the organization.

Activities

Outputs

3.1

Test the tailored tool.

  • Point factor method is implemented within the organization